Tag Archives: Amazon

Slow Death of the American Writer? Not So Fast…

10 Apr

Here’s an interesting blog post I came across today, and had to share. It’s a rebuttal of Scott Turow’s NYT article titled, The Slow Death of the American Author.

A List of Things Scott Turow Doesn't Care About

Scott Turow woke up from his slumber recently to bark nonsense about Amazon’s acquisition of Goodreads on the Authors Guild blog, before being thoroughly eviscerated in the comments.

Undeterred, Turow sought out the considerably larger platform of the New York Times’ Op-Ed pages on Monday to decry The Slow Death of the American Writer.

On reading the latter, my first thought was: if Scott Turow didn’t spend so much time hating Amazon and pretending self-publishing didn’t exist, maybe he wouldn’t be so depressed.

It’s easy to poke fun at Scott Turow’s views. A child could de-construct his arguments, while laughing at how a practicing lawyer is unable to grasp the definition of the word “monopoly.” If you want a proper debunking of his Op-Ed, Techdirt do a good job, but I think there’s no real point attempting to engage Turow on this issue. His hatred of Amazon and fear of change is completely clouding his logic.

What bothers me about Turow’s obsession with Amazon and his opposition to change is not his blatant disregard for the facts (or the definition of words), it’s that he allows this Luddism to become all-consuming, blinding him to the issues that really matter to writers.

Even if we granted Turow his brain-dead thesis, we still have time before Amazon becomes The Great Evil and exclusively powers its website with the tears of exploited writers.

But there’s a bunch of really awful stuff happening right now that Turow ignores, and has been ignoring, since his term as Authors Guild President began.

Continue reading: A List of Things Scott Turow Doesn’t Care About.

Advertisements

How To Ensure Half Your Readers Isolate Themselves From Your Books

1 Mar

Tom Robbins has a strong voice. He also uses very colorful language throughout the book, Jitterbug Perfume. Unfortunately, not all of it was impressive to me. Just when I was starting to enjoy his original use of language, (the only redeeming quality, in my opinion) he would throw in a completely juvenile and offensive turn of phrase. I couldn’t get into the story. I felt like I was reading the diary of a thirteen year old boy, or a really perverted old man. I did not care for about half of the descriptions, which made me put the book down. Actually, I may have thrown it out of frustration.

I’ve only had a handful of books that I haven’t finished, and it’s a shame that I had to add this one to the pile. I’m sure that there is a plot, although by the reviews I read on Amazon prior to purchasing it, even that is debatable. The author has been described by some as sounding arrogant and pretentious (I know they are similar terms, but I feel that this accentuates the truth) and I found this to be the case in the 100+ pages that I did read. Oftentimes, I would be trying to follow the story, and then — BAM! — here comes the author, inserting himself throughout the narration in a way that was annoying and forced.

Out of four sets of oddball characters, the ancient king was the only one I found entertaining. I wish he wasn’t so obsessed with his anatomy and the functions of it, but Alobar was the most relatable of all, in my opinion. I found myself skimming ahead just to follow his adventures.

Robbins should not try to write women. They are pitiful, undeveloped characters, and seem to exist in this story for the sole purpose of sexual references. Being a woman, I can tell that Robbins doesn’t care in the least what goes on in a woman’s head. I felt alienated from the story right away.

I would quote the book for examples, but instead of passing along the absurdity and crudeness of Robbins’ writing, here is a “How-To” list, which has only a pinch of sarcasm.

How To Ensure Half Your Readers Isolate Themselves From Your Books

Jitterbug Perfume
Image via Wikipedia

1. Include an obscure reference to a vegetable, preferably even before the story actually begins.

2. Introduce several sets of characters, and move so quickly between them that your reader immediately feels disorientated and therefore does not notice that they are all unbelievable and flat.

3. Complete # 2 within the first 20 pages.

4. Use crude sexual references whenever you feel your reader’s shock value might have worn off.

5. Use twice as many sexual references as that.

6. Don’t make any of your women characters of above average intelligence, since your goal is to offend half of your readers, and women are, like, half the population.

7. Do make your women characters only good for one thing: serving up sex like afternoon tea. Oh, and make them unbelievably eager to perform oral sex. Often.

8. Do force your opinions in throughout the story, but make sure all of the characters think the same way. There can be no arguing back from your creations! Also make sure that readers know there is only one “logical” answer and anyone who disagrees is a complete moron. Or, even worse, a person of faith. The horror!

9. Do imply that your book is the best thing that could ever happen to your reader.

10. And finally, MAKE SURE IT’S OBVIOUS YOU’VE BEEN UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF SOME ILLEGAL SUBSTANCE THE WHOLE CREATIVE PROCESS!

So I have to admit, this book is adored by many people. I don’t understand why, but this book has sold, and has even earned the title of “National Bestseller.” My belief is that it could have been so much better. Who knows? Maybe it wouldn’t have sold as many copies and I’m in the minority.

One last thought: I used to like beets.

What books have you abandoned or struggled to get through?

%d bloggers like this: